Every era has its own model of human reference, the elites to try to imitate. As for the old monarchies, the prevailing thought identifies ... N three social classes clergy, nobility and people of the social structure. It is a mistake the nobility consisted of several layers mixed. There were different types of nobility of the sword, robe and other again, ending perhaps with that of the bell tower. It was also easy for a family pass from one class to another: a royal decree that was enough to raise a family status to the plebeian nobility or a decision of the King of Justice that degrades someone from being a noble than the plebeian. Then came the French Revolution and the aristocracy was then passed on to merchants and bankers. In a society like ours, in which the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity have helped to shape the structure of the state and also that of society, the stratification becomes even more complex. The current social structure can be compared to a river deep enough to receive trouble-free all minor watercourses that are fed along the route. It just looks like a river that welcomes without discrimination, in a democratic, all its components. But this indiscriminate flow increases so the amount of trade relations and can no longer be controlled, with water sometimes clear and sometimes polluted, to cause flooding, floods and incidents of all kinds. This decadent society, apparently open, relativist values \u200b\u200band based on weak and always negotiable produced a social model of man suited to it. The daily work in an environment characterized by lack of limits to the absence of the sense of the sacred, from the evaluation criteria of action on, think of the "mild law" by G. Zagrebelsky has fostered the development of the forger: the western society, secular, progressive, scientific rewards counterfeiters. Counterfeiters produce items that do not work, toxic assets, fake books, such as the Da Vinci Code, false accusations, see Woodcock. As in other times, the behavior indicates a prevailing social trend, shows the quality of a given society. But as in every age there are people who do not identify with that quality. The elusive progress that has liquefied tradition, has had only trade in goods, which they have also become liquid: from sellers of goods has passed to vendors of money up to the current vendors false bootleg goods, debts. Indeed the process of falsification started with the theses of Luther, who recalls how the current Pontiff, was based on bad translations we come to deny the truth, with the processes tarot. Perhaps we are witnessing the end of a social process. As de Maistre said "men are not masters of their own affairs and events: this is indeed incontrovertibly proven by the fact that when the Revolution reached the height of tyranny, it took little to reverse it, the eighteenth century occurred as a revolt against God, who punished this heinous crime retreating from history, leaving to men. "
