"Science does not solve the problems that man puts itself but those that arise."
How
you do not agree with Gomez-Davila, science is based on the combinations, the classifications, applying these principles to the words you get unexpected results, if we compare science and nonsense, in terms of set theory, we find that science is included in the silly, or that part of the whole stupidity is done by science. This may suggest a despicable use of Venn diagrams, but it is not. By comparing the vocabulary we find that science is defined as the systematic and systematic knowledge that you possess around a certain order of phenomena and with a silly act by idiots. But idiot means incomplete, then everything returns to science is made by acts incomleti, Popper's falsifiability talk about it. You should be aware of the fact that science is a self that is often made a fool. Recently, a physicist, Stephen Hawkinhg, reasoning that only by using abstract models has stated that "The universe does not need God" from what the newspapers the universe or consequence of the law of gravity. Think so is to confuse causes the masses of the planets. With the effect of the law. Unfortunately, those who see problems only from a viewpoint often commits this error.
This awareness has become prevalent among the citizens, just so you can have a different and more useful distribution of funds just as the Pharisees contemporaries, will be enabled to understand that with our own efforts alone do not make a better world and perhaps will be converted.
0 comments:
Post a Comment