Carlo Baratta
The authority does not derive from the social contract
The error of Rousseau produced authoritarianism and liquefaction of the reports.
So gloss Gomez Davila "A multitude uniform does not claim freedom. The hierarchical society is not only the only one in which man can be free, but also the only one where the press be "
.
The revolutionary process led to the dissolution of traditional society and the social crisis: terrorism, riot, sedition raging in Europe. The Christian religion put limits on the principles of public action and ensured stability and order. source of authority. Authority derives from the author, who is the author of something only has authority if a company has multiple authors, but counterfeiters, if man has become f urbo more than smart, clever rather than smart, who can only see the immediate benefits and is not willing to face sacrifices in view of long-term assets, the authority is reduced to technical procedures, or both burocratica.perciò authority, both the political and the technical disappear. In any society it is necessary and productive organization there are some that drive, so that society will not smash. According to Catholic teaching authority "from God, the author of human nature. God created man, he has made social, that is destined to live in society, is intended to relate to others, to understand and accept their limits, then God, willing to human social nature, he wanted the authority. If man were destined to live alone, would not need the language. This conception of authority is opposed to the revolutionary for whom "all power comes from the people." The so-called thinkers who have denied the derivation of authority from God are the responsibility of absolutism. These theorists are solely responsible for the ruin of the concept of authority, reduced to a work made by men and therefore men can undo. The authority shall have its sanctity. If not, can not compel people to obey, because the value of human freedom prevails and earlier than any coercion. The 'authorities should not be confused with the system of government, the manner with which you exercise. The fact that the authority is exercised in practice by one (monarchy), a few (aristocracy) or the majority (democracy) does not change its nature: the more authority derives from God, even if there are different ways in which appointed who will have to exercise the . The social contract theory This theory postulates that every man, to form a company, has been stripped of some of his rights and freedoms. The sum of all these parties voluntarily ceded by the people would eventually be handed to someone because they exercise their authority. For Rousseau, society is a limit to freedom of men. Hence the revolutionary idea of \u200b\u200bthe historical process as a liberation from the bondage of society and its institutions. Bobbio also remembered as the transition from tribes to the rule of law is "a painstaking process of total liberation of the individual by society" , whose ultimate goal is the creation of 'new uono . Nell' new man the individuals with their ways of thinking, and will be distinctive and contrasting blend and disappear into the collective personality, which generates a new individual collective total , in which everyone is simultaneously himself and all, having released the "limit" as represented by his personality. For the idea of \u200b\u200brevolution is no more seen more as an aid to understanding and to find fulfillment as a person but as a threat to its identity having just as a whole. The revolutionary vision to work need to see another enemy. This idea has its reflection in the conception of society as a ratio of potentially conflicting forces: rich and poor, master / servant, bourgeoisie / proletariat, old / young, men and women, teachers / students, rulers / ruled, and so on. Hence the incessant becoming, contradiction as the essence of the revolutionary process. The company's revolutionary society incessant contradiction, the company's chaos as a principle of liberation. What solution can The truth, however, is another: the man, daily needs of others, just remember that the little man for many years is not autonomous and can not survive without the help of others. If man is social by nature, it follows the natural character also authority, because there can be no society without authority, different people can not achieve the common good without someone to coordinate their will. Serious problem is not to destroy the authority, but government: the authorities understood as a privilege, not as a service, without consciousness of the serious obligations, what could be violating the justice which must be fought. The only historical form in which this occurred was a monarchy. The consecration of the king through the anointing, which historians of the twentieth century such as Marc Bloch (1886-1944) have written important pages, not only is the public declaration by the Church authorities that the of kings is of divine origin, but also the recognition by those who must exercise the authority of the serious obligations to God that this entails.
CIRCULAR EDGE
No 179 Year 6 of 9 November 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment